The world has come ominously close to a nuclear war in the past and it could happen again as Russia and the West have slipped back into what seems like another Cold War, world-renowned scholar Noam Chomsky tells RT’s Sophie&Co.
Once NATO has expanded its borders all the way to reach Russia, its mission has very much changed since it was initially established, Chomsky said. Now, its aim is to take control of global energy systems rather than maintaining intergovernmental military balance.
The world has never been closer to a nuclear war that could wipe out all of its initiators, and the threat is no longer a thing of history, according to Chomsky.
“The worst-case scenario, of course, would be a nuclear war, which would be terrible. Both states that initiate it will be wiped out by the consequences. That’s the worst-case. And it’s come ominously close several times in the past, dramatically close. And it could happen again, but not planned, but just by the accidental interactions that take place – that has almost happened,” Chomsky told Sophie Shevardnadze.
The overall situation of international instability was worsened by US involvement in the Middle Eastern affairs and damaging regional conflicts, Chomsky says, comparing its actions in Iraq to a hit with a“sledgehammer.”
Chomsky went on to discuss with RT the former NSA contractor and whistleblower Edward Snowden, and the US’ ever-expanding global spying that are having a dangerous impact on the domestic population and is inspiring other governments worldwide to do the same.
For a short video interview, please click this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNkXaxd9Dow
RT
http://rt.com/news/202995-chomsky-rt-nuclear-war/
Again, Chomsky does:
Not tell anything new: He merely states what all who cared to acquire a minimum degree of independent information knew.
While he, as typical for Chomsky omits the main factors: Namely, who is driving the NATO eastward expansion, for which reasons, financed by whose money, infiltrated into Washington via which think tanks… ans so forth..
The same hollow semantics as we are used to hear from Chomsky about the Palestine – Israel discourse. Need I to remind the reader that Chomsky finds discussing 9/11 as ridiculously needless? So who is Chomsky, and what is Chomsky? You find out for yourself is you care and spare you my opinion until the day I can find the evidence which I am sure is out there if we just look hard enough.