What explanation the America still want about Chinese air carrier?

August 10, the Chinese air carrier became an issue in the U. S. Department of State regular news conference. Nuland the new spokeswoman seemed lack of logical and paranoid.

There are three key works in this questions and answers.

First is “concern”. The issue was derived from the Chinese air carrier had been tested in August 10.  Nuland said the United States was concerning about the development of air carrier in China, “this part of our larger concern that China is not as transparent as other countries. It is not as transparent as the United States about its military acquisitions, about its military budget,” she said.

It was paranoid that their concern did not mention the Chinese concern at all. China has 18 thousand kilometer’s coastline, so the national security, the territorial waters should be concern by Chinese military force. Before the first air carrier, China was the only country in UN Security Council. The budget of US Ministry of Defense is more than 600 billion, why US till concerns about China’s defense policies and the protection budget with such a supreme advantage.

The second word is “transparency”. With the words of Nuland we have to wander that if our air carrier is invisible or miniature?

The third one is “explanation”. “And we’d like to have the kind of open, transparent relationship in military-to-military affairs,” Nuland said. China already said this air carrier is build for academic research and training. The development of Chinese air carrier is for the peace of the world, and what kind of answer America still want China to normally explanation? China said we need the air carrier, was it still not enough?

Source: People’s Daily

Translated and edited by Yang Jingmin

Leave a Reply